Archives July 2026

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

What is Selling by Proxy?

Selling by proxy means growing revenue primarily through other companies’ sales motions instead of your own direct team. A channel partner, reseller, or agency sits between you and the end customer, doing the selling, and sometimes the implementation and support, on your behalf. Your company still owns the product and the relationship with the partner, but the day-to-day selling work is delegated.

This is not the same as simply having an affiliate program bolted onto a direct sales motion. Selling by proxy, done well, means restructuring how your company thinks about go-to-market: partners are not a side channel, they are the primary engine of growth for a meaningful share of your revenue.

Core Thesis: Indirect Sales is the Future of B2B SaaS

The core argument for selling by proxy is simple: your prospective customers already trust someone else more than they trust you. They trust their existing IT consultant, their accountant, their agency of record, or the platform they already use every day. Selling through that trusted relationship closes deals faster and cheaper than trying to build the same level of trust from a cold outbound sequence.

This thesis does not mean direct sales disappears. Most mature SaaS companies run a hybrid model, where direct sales handles the largest strategic accounts and proxy channels handle the long tail of the market that a direct team could never reach cost-effectively. The question is not whether to sell by proxy, but how much of your growth should come from it.

Read More

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

Why You Need a Partner Program Lifecycle

Most partner programs do not fail because the idea is wrong. They fail because there is no clear partner program lifecycle guiding the work, so the program runs as a single ongoing activity instead of a series of distinct phases, each with its own goals and its own definition of success. A partner signed six months ago needs something completely different from your team than a partner you are recruiting today, and treating them the same way is how promising programs quietly stall.

This guide breaks the partner program lifecycle into six phases: planning, recruitment, onboarding, activation, optimization, and measurement. Each phase has a clear entry point, a clear exit point, and a small set of metrics that tell you whether partners are ready to move to the next stage.

Planning Phase: Setting Goals for Your Partner Program Lifecycle

Before recruiting a single partner, define what a good partner looks like for your business. Skipping this step is the single most common cause of programs that sign dozens of partners but generate little revenue, since decisions made here shape every later stage of the partner program lifecycle.

Read More

Estimated reading time: 7 minutes

Introduction: Direct vs. Indirect Strategy

Most SaaS companies do not choose between direct and indirect sales. They end up running both, often without a plan for channel conflict management. A direct team closes strategic accounts while partners work the long tail, and for a while nobody notices the overlap. Then a partner and a direct rep chase the same account. A partner undercuts price to win a deal, or a rep bypasses a registered opportunity to hit quota. The tension that comes from running two motions in parallel becomes visible.

Channel conflict is not a sign that partnerships were a mistake. It is a predictable byproduct of growth. The SaaS companies that manage it well build a genuine hybrid sales model. They avoid defaulting to pure direct or pure channel. This guide covers what channel conflict looks like and how to manage it operationally. It also shows how to build the alignment that keeps direct and partner motions reinforcing each other instead of competing.

What Is Channel Conflict Management?

Effective channel conflict management starts with catching the pattern early. Channel conflict happens when your direct sales team and your partner channel compete for the same customer, deal, or margin. They should work complementary segments of the market instead. It shows up in a handful of recurring forms. A direct rep and a partner might prospect the same account without knowing it. Two partners might chase the same lead because territories were never defined. Or a partner might discount aggressively to win a deal your direct team was already working.

The immediate impact is usually financial: undercut pricing, duplicated sales effort, and disputed commissions. The longer-term impact is worse. Partners who lose a deal to your own direct team quietly stop bringing you their best opportunities. So do partners who feel your reps do not respect deal registration. Once a partner deprioritizes your product internally, rebuilding that trust takes a long time. Avoiding the conflict in the first place is far easier.

Read More

Estimated reading time: 7 minutes

Introduction: Why Your Channel Sales Tech Stack Matters

A channel program is only as scalable as the systems behind it. Once you move past a handful of partners tracked in a spreadsheet, manual processes break down fast. Deal registrations get lost, onboarding turns inconsistent, and nobody has a clear view of partner-sourced pipeline. As a result, the right channel sales tech stack removes that ceiling. It lets you support dozens or hundreds of partners without growing your headcount at the same pace.

This playbook maps tools to each stage of the partner lifecycle: recruitment, enablement, activation, co-selling, and reporting. You do not need every tool listed here on day one. Instead, pick the tools that solve your biggest current bottleneck first, then expand as your program matures.

Stage 1 Tools: Recruitment

Recruiting the right partners starts with finding and reaching the right people efficiently.

• Apollo: a sales intelligence and outreach platform for building targeted lists of prospective partners and running multi-channel outreach sequences
• Kaspr: a prospecting tool that surfaces verified contact details for decision-makers at potential partner companies, useful for LinkedIn-based recruiting
• Reply.io: an outreach automation platform for personalized email and multi-touch sequences. It nurtures partner applicants from first contact through signed agreement.

Read More

Estimated reading time: 16 minutes

The SaaS channel strategy framework is a five-stage partner lifecycle — Recruit → Onboard → Activate → Co-Sell → Report. It turns unmanaged partner relationships into a repeatable, measurable revenue motion. Each stage has its own goal, tools, and exit criteria, and the stages are sequential. You cannot activate a partner you have not onboarded, and you cannot co-sell with a partner who has not closed a first deal.

Best for: SaaS founders, VPs of Sales, and partner/channel managers building or fixing a partner program at Series A–C scale. Not built for enterprise channel orgs with a dedicated channel chief. Also not a fit for pre-PMF startups without a repeatable direct-sales motion to model partner enablement on.

What you’ll learn:

• The five stages of the framework and the specific artifact that defines “done” at each one
• A decision rule for whether to build a channel motion now or wait
• The 3 KPIs that matter most per stage (15 total) and the mistakes that break each one
• Which tools — PRM, LMS, CRM — map to which stage
• A copy/paste summary you can drop into a deck, doc, or Slack thread

Decision Rule: Should You Build a SaaS Channel Strategy Framework Now?

• If you don’t yet have a repeatable direct-sales motion — a documented ICP and a sales process reps can run without you — then don’t start a channel program yet. Partners amplify whatever motion already exists, inconsistency included.
• If 5+ customers have already asked “do you have a partner who can implement or resell this,” then start Recruit now — you have organic partner demand, which is the cheapest signal you’ll get.
• If your ACV is under roughly $3–$5K/year and the product doesn’t need implementation help, then a full channel motion probably isn’t worth the overhead — an affiliate or referral program is a better fit.
• If you can’t dedicate at least 0.5 FTE, even as a hybrid role, to partner management, then wait. Unmanaged programs plateau at Recruit and never reach Activate.
• If your product requires technical integration, configuration, or change management to deliver value, then channel is a strong fit — partners absorb the services burden you can’t scale internally.
• If you already have channel conflict — direct reps and partners competing for the same accounts — and no territory or registration rules, then fix the conflict rules before recruiting more partners. See how to manage channel conflict with a hybrid sales model — more partners on a broken system compounds the problem.

Read More